Toyota sequoia vs. lincoln aviator: fuel efficiency vs. performance
What To Know
- In contrast, the Aviator’s V6 engine delivers an estimated 17 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway, while the Grand Touring trim gets slightly lower fuel economy numbers at 16 mpg in the city and 22 mpg on the highway.
- The Aviator takes comfort to a new level with heated and massaging front seats, a panoramic sunroof, and a Revel Ultima 3D audio system.
- The Sequoia comes well-equipped with a range of technology features, including an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, and a suite of Toyota Safety Sense driver-assist technologies.
When it comes to full-size SUVs, the Toyota Sequoia and Lincoln Aviator are two popular choices that offer a blend of capability, comfort, and luxury. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between these two formidable SUVs, examining their performance, features, and overall value proposition.
Performance
Engine and Powertrain
The Toyota Sequoia comes standard with a powerful 5.7-liter V8 engine that delivers 381 horsepower and 401 lb-ft of torque. It is paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission that provides smooth and responsive shifting.
The Lincoln Aviator, on the other hand, offers a more diverse range of powertrain options. The base model features a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged V6 engine that produces 400 horsepower and 415 lb-ft of torque. For those seeking even more power, the Aviator Grand Touring trim comes equipped with a 3.4-liter twin-turbocharged V6 engine that generates an impressive 494 horsepower and 630 lb-ft of torque. Both Aviator engines are mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Fuel Economy
When it comes to fuel economy, the Sequoia lags behind the Aviator. The Sequoia’s V8 engine returns an EPA-estimated 13 mpg in the city and 17 mpg on the highway. In contrast, the Aviator’s V6 engine delivers an estimated 17 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway, while the Grand Touring trim gets slightly lower fuel economy numbers at 16 mpg in the city and 22 mpg on the highway.
Features
Interior Space and Comfort
The Sequoia boasts a spacious interior with seating for up to eight passengers. The first and second rows offer ample headroom and legroom, while the third row is more suitable for children or occasional use. The Lincoln Aviator’s interior is equally spacious, with seating for seven passengers. However, the Aviator’s third row is slightly less spacious than the Sequoia’s.
In terms of comfort, both SUVs offer plush seating and a variety of amenities. The Sequoia features heated and ventilated front seats, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and a premium audio system. The Aviator takes comfort to a new level with heated and massaging front seats, a panoramic sunroof, and a Revel Ultima 3D audio system.
Technology and Safety
The Sequoia comes well-equipped with a range of technology features, including an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, and a suite of Toyota Safety Sense driver-assist technologies. The Aviator offers a more advanced infotainment system with a 10.1-inch touchscreen, SYNC 4A with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a Ford Co-Pilot360 suite of driver-assist features.
Off-Road Capabilities
While both the Sequoia and Aviator are primarily designed for on-road driving, the Sequoia has a slight edge in off-road capabilities. It comes standard with rear-wheel drive and offers an optional four-wheel drive system with a two-speed transfer case and a locking rear differential. The Aviator, on the other hand, is only available with all-wheel drive, which provides improved traction on slippery surfaces but is not as capable as a true four-wheel drive system for serious off-roading.
Towing and Payload
The Sequoia is the clear winner in terms of towing and payload capacity. It can tow up to 9,520 pounds and has a payload capacity of 1,740 pounds. The Aviator’s towing capacity is rated at 6,700 pounds, while its payload capacity is 1,600 pounds.
Price and Value
The Toyota Sequoia has a starting price of $58,985, while the Lincoln Aviator starts at $54,900. However, the Aviator offers a wider range of trim levels and options, which can significantly increase its price.
In terms of value, both SUVs offer a good balance of features, performance, and capability for their respective price ranges. However, the Sequoia’s superior towing and off-road capabilities may make it a better choice for those who need a more rugged and versatile SUV.
Which SUV is Right for You?
The choice between the Toyota Sequoia and Lincoln Aviator ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize towing capacity, off-road capabilities, and a spacious interior, the Sequoia is an excellent choice. However, if you seek a more luxurious and technologically advanced SUV with better fuel economy, the Aviator is a worthy contender.
Final Verdict: A Matter of Preference
Both the Toyota Sequoia and Lincoln Aviator are exceptional full-size SUVs that offer a unique blend of performance, comfort, and features. While the Sequoia excels in towing, off-roading, and interior space, the Aviator offers a more refined and technologically advanced experience with improved fuel economy. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on which factors you value most in an SUV.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
1. Which SUV has better fuel economy?
The Lincoln Aviator has better fuel economy than the Toyota Sequoia.
2. Which SUV has more towing capacity?
The Toyota Sequoia has a higher towing capacity than the Lincoln Aviator.
3. Which SUV has a more spacious interior?
The Toyota Sequoia has a more spacious interior than the Lincoln Aviator, especially in the third row.
4. Which SUV has a better infotainment system?
The Lincoln Aviator has a more advanced infotainment system with a larger touchscreen and more features.
5. Which SUV is more reliable?
Both the Toyota Sequoia and Lincoln Aviator have good reliability ratings, but the Sequoia has a slight edge in long-term reliability.
