What To Know
- In contrast, the Access 125 has a more traditional scooter design with a rounded body and smooth curves.
- The Suzuki Lets takes the lead in this category, delivering an impressive 63 km/l, while the Access 125 offers a respectable 54 km/l.
- The Access 125, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive feature list, including a semi-digital instrument cluster, USB charging port, and a larger under-seat storage capacity.
When it comes to affordable and reliable scooters in the Indian market, Suzuki Lets and Access 125 stand out as two popular choices. Both scooters offer a mix of practicality, fuel efficiency, and style. However, there are some key differences between these two models that can help you make an informed decision. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll explore the Suzuki Lets vs Access 125 in detail, highlighting their features, specifications, performance, and overall value.
Design and Style
The Suzuki Lets features a compact and sporty design with a long, narrow body. Its sharp lines and angular headlights give it a modern and aggressive look. In contrast, the Access 125 has a more traditional scooter design with a rounded body and smooth curves. It comes in a wider range of colors, allowing for more personalization.
Engine and Performance
Both the Suzuki Lets and Access 125 are powered by 125cc single-cylinder engines. However, the Lets’ engine produces slightly less power (8.7 PS) compared to the Access 125’s 8.7 PS. This difference is not significant in real-world performance, as both scooters offer adequate acceleration and top speed for city commuting.
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor for budget-conscious buyers. The Suzuki Lets takes the lead in this category, delivering an impressive 63 km/l, while the Access 125 offers a respectable 54 km/l. This makes the Lets a more economical option in the long run.
Features and Convenience
The Suzuki Lets comes with a basic set of features, including a digital speedometer, fuel gauge, and under-seat storage. The Access 125, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive feature list, including a semi-digital instrument cluster, USB charging port, and a larger under-seat storage capacity.
Comfort and Handling
Both the Lets and Access 125 provide a comfortable riding experience. The Lets has a slightly softer suspension, making it more forgiving over rough roads. The Access 125, with its larger wheels, offers better stability and handling, especially at higher speeds.
Price and Availability
The Suzuki Lets is priced slightly lower than the Access 125. The Lets starts at Rs. 65,000 (ex-showroom), while the Access 125 starts at Rs. 70,000 (ex-showroom). Both scooters are widely available across India, with a vast network of dealerships and service centers.
Final Note: The Right Choice for Your Needs
Ultimately, the best choice between the Suzuki Lets and Access 125 depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize fuel efficiency, affordability, and a compact design, the Lets is a great option. However, if you value additional features, better handling, and a wider range of color choices, the Access 125 may be a more suitable choice.
What You Need to Know
Q: Which scooter has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Suzuki Lets offers better fuel efficiency at 63 km/l, compared to the Access 125’s 54 km/l.
Q: Which scooter is more affordable?
A: The Suzuki Lets has a lower starting price at Rs. 65,000, compared to the Access 125’s starting price of Rs. 70,000.
Q: Which scooter has more features?
A: The Access 125 offers a more comprehensive feature list, including a semi-digital instrument cluster, USB charging port, and larger under-seat storage capacity.
Q: Which scooter is better for city commuting?
A: Both scooters are well-suited for city commuting, but the Suzuki Lets‘ compact design and fuel efficiency make it a slightly better choice for congested urban areas.
Q: Which scooter has better handling?
A: The Access 125’s larger wheels and more stable handling make it a better choice for higher speeds and longer rides.