What To Know
- In terms of suspension, the Gixxer 150 has telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear, while the Pulsar 160 NS has telescopic forks at the front and a Nitrox monoshock at the rear.
- The Gixxer 150 has a 266mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar 160 NS has a 260mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc.
- The Gixxer 150 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, a gear position indicator, and a trip meter, while the Pulsar 160 NS has a semi-digital instrument cluster with an analog tachometer and a digital speedometer.
When it comes to choosing a naked streetfighter motorcycle, two of the most popular options on the Indian market are the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and the Pulsar 160 NS. Both bikes offer a great balance of performance, affordability, and style, making them ideal for both daily commuting and weekend rides. But which one is the better choice? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll put the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS head-to-head and explore their key features, performance, and value for money to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Styling
Both the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS feature aggressive and sporty styling that exudes street presence. The Gixxer 150 has a sharper and more angular design, with sharp lines and a muscular fuel tank. The Pulsar 160 NS, on the other hand, has a more fluid and curvaceous design, with a sculpted fuel tank and sleek bodywork. Ultimately, the choice between the two designs is a matter of personal preference.
Engine and Performance
The Suzuki Gixxer 150 is powered by a 149cc air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 13.9 bhp of power and 13.8 Nm of torque. The Pulsar 160 NS, on the other hand, is powered by a 160cc air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 15.5 bhp of power and 14.6 Nm of torque. While the Pulsar 160 NS has a slight edge in terms of power and torque, the Gixxer 150 is known for its smooth and refined engine performance.
Handling and Suspension
Both the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS offer nimble handling and a comfortable ride. The Gixxer 150 has a slightly shorter wheelbase and a more aggressive steering geometry, giving it a slightly sharper handling experience. The Pulsar 160 NS, on the other hand, has a longer wheelbase and a more upright riding position, making it more comfortable for long-distance rides. In terms of suspension, the Gixxer 150 has telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear, while the Pulsar 160 NS has telescopic forks at the front and a Nitrox monoshock at the rear.
Braking and Safety
Both the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS come equipped with disc brakes at both the front and rear, providing ample stopping power. The Gixxer 150 has a 266mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar 160 NS has a 260mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc. In terms of safety features, the Gixxer 150 comes with a single-channel ABS, while the Pulsar 160 NS offers a dual-channel ABS as standard.
Features and Technology
The Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS offer a range of features and technology to enhance the riding experience. The Gixxer 150 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, a gear position indicator, and a trip meter, while the Pulsar 160 NS has a semi-digital instrument cluster with an analog tachometer and a digital speedometer. The Pulsar 160 NS also features a gear shift indicator and a low fuel indicator.
Price and Value for Money
The Suzuki Gixxer 150 is priced slightly lower than the Pulsar 160 NS, making it a more affordable option. However, the Pulsar 160 NS offers a higher power output and more safety features, making it a better value for money proposition for those who prioritize performance and safety.
Verdict
Choosing between the Suzuki Gixxer 150 and Pulsar 160 NS depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a stylish and affordable naked streetfighter with a smooth and refined engine, the Suzuki Gixxer 150 is an excellent choice. If you’re looking for a more powerful and feature-rich naked streetfighter with better safety features, the Pulsar 160 NS is the better option.
Answers to Your Questions
Q: Which bike has a better engine performance?
A: The Pulsar 160 NS has a more powerful engine than the Gixxer 150, producing 15.5 bhp of power compared to the Gixxer’s 13.9 bhp.
Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Gixxer 150 is slightly more fuel-efficient than the Pulsar 160 NS, offering a mileage of around 50-55 kmpl compared to the Pulsar’s 45-50 kmpl.
Q: Which bike has better safety features?
A: The Pulsar 160 NS offers better safety features than the Gixxer 150, including a dual-channel ABS, a gear shift indicator, and a low fuel indicator.