What To Know
- The Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the CVT, while the CX-30 gets an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway.
- The Outback is a great choice for drivers who need a spacious and versatile vehicle with all-wheel drive, while the CX-30 is a good option for drivers who want a more agile and fuel-efficient vehicle.
- The CX-30 gets an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the CVT.
When it comes to choosing a compact crossover SUV, two of the most popular options on the market are the Subaru Outback and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles offer a unique blend of features, performance, and style, making them appealing to a wide range of drivers. In this blog post, we’ll compare the Subaru Outback vs. Mazda CX-30 to help you decide which one is the best choice for you.
Performance and Handling
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 offer different driving experiences. The Outback is powered by a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. The CX-30, on the other hand, has a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that generates 186 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque. Both engines are paired with a six-speed automatic transmission, but the Outback also offers a continuously variable transmission (CVT) option.
In terms of handling, the Outback has a more rugged feel, while the CX-30 is more agile and sporty. The Outback’s all-wheel drive system gives it excellent traction in all weather conditions, while the CX-30’s front-wheel drive system makes it more fuel-efficient.
Fuel Efficiency
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 have similar fuel efficiency ratings. The Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the CVT, while the CX-30 gets an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway.
Interior and Comfort
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 have spacious and comfortable interiors. The Outback has more cargo space than the CX-30, with 35.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 75.7 cubic feet with the seats folded down. The CX-30 has 20.2 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and 45.2 cubic feet with the seats folded down.
Both vehicles offer a variety of features to keep you comfortable on long drives, including heated and ventilated seats, a sunroof, and a premium audio system. The Outback also has a dual-zone climate control system, while the CX-30 has a single-zone system.
Technology and Safety
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 come with a variety of standard and available technology features. Both vehicles have a touchscreen infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and a rearview camera. The Outback also offers a navigation system, a head-up display, and a Harman Kardon premium audio system.
In terms of safety, the Outback and CX-30 both received a five-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Both vehicles also come with a variety of standard safety features, including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control.
Price
The Subaru Outback has a starting price of $26,645, while the Mazda CX-30 starts at $22,945. The Outback is more expensive than the CX-30, but it also offers more features and a more spacious interior.
Which One Is Right for You?
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 are both excellent choices for compact crossover SUV shoppers. The Outback is a great choice for drivers who need a spacious and versatile vehicle with all-wheel drive. The CX-30 is a good option for drivers who want a more agile and fuel-efficient vehicle.
Ultimately, the best way to decide which vehicle is right for you is to test drive both of them. This will allow you to compare their performance, handling, and features firsthand.
Summary
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-30 are both excellent choices for compact crossover SUV shoppers. The Outback is a great choice for drivers who need a spacious and versatile vehicle with all-wheel drive, while the CX-30 is a good option for drivers who want a more agile and fuel-efficient vehicle. Ultimately, the best way to decide which vehicle is right for you is to test drive both of them.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency, the Subaru Outback or the Mazda CX-30?
A: The Mazda CX-30 has slightly better fuel efficiency than the Subaru Outback. The CX-30 gets an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the CVT.
Q: Which vehicle has more cargo space, the Subaru Outback or the Mazda CX-30?
A: The Subaru Outback has more cargo space than the Mazda CX-30. The Outback has 35.4 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and 75.7 cubic feet with the seats folded down, while the CX-30 has 20.2 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and 45.2 cubic feet with the seats folded down.
Q: Which vehicle has more technology features, the Subaru Outback or the Mazda CX-30?
A: The Subaru Outback has more technology features than the Mazda CX-30. The Outback offers a navigation system, a head-up display, and a Harman Kardon premium audio system, while the CX-30 does not.