Subaru Outback Vs. Cx-9: Discover The Clear Winner For Families And Outdoor Enthusiasts
What To Know
- The Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, while the CX-9 gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
- However, the Outback offers more standard features than the CX-9, so shoppers may want to consider the Outback if they are looking for a vehicle with a more comprehensive list of features.
- The Subaru Outback has a reputation for being a reliable vehicle, while the Mazda CX-9 has a less stellar reputation for reliability.
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 are two popular midsize SUVs that offer a variety of features and amenities for families. Both vehicles have spacious interiors, plenty of cargo space, and excellent safety ratings. However, there are some key differences between the two SUVs that shoppers should consider before making a purchase. In this blog post, we will compare the Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 in terms of their performance, fuel efficiency, interior features, safety features, and price.
Performance
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 offer different engine options and performance capabilities. The Outback comes standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. A 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 260 horsepower and 277 lb-ft of torque is also available. The CX-9, on the other hand, comes standard with a 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque. A 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque is also available.
In terms of performance, the CX-9 has a slight edge over the Outback. The CX-9’s turbocharged engine provides more power and torque, which makes it quicker off the line and more responsive at highway speeds. The Outback, on the other hand, is more fuel-efficient than the CX-9. The Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, while the CX-9 gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
Interior Features
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 offer spacious and well-appointed interiors. Both vehicles come standard with a variety of features, including a touchscreen infotainment system, a rearview camera, and a power liftgate. The Outback, however, offers a few more standard features than the CX-9, such as heated front seats, a sunroof, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel.
In terms of cargo space, the Outback and CX-9 are very similar. The Outback offers 35.4 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row of seats and 73.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the second row folded down. The CX-9 offers 36.1 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row of seats and 71.2 cubic feet of cargo space with the second row folded down.
Safety Features
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 both received excellent safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Both vehicles come standard with a variety of safety features, including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control. The Outback, however, offers a few more standard safety features than the CX-9, such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.
Price
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 are both priced similarly. The Outback starts at $26,645, while the CX-9 starts at $33,960. However, the Outback offers more standard features than the CX-9, so shoppers may want to consider the Outback if they are looking for a vehicle with a more comprehensive list of features.
Which SUV is Right for You?
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 are both excellent choices for families. The Outback is a more fuel-efficient and affordable option, while the CX-9 offers more power and a more spacious interior. Ultimately, the best SUV for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.
Beyond the Basics: Additional Factors to Consider
In addition to the factors discussed above, there are a few other things that shoppers should consider before making a purchase decision. These factors include:
- Reliability: The Subaru Outback has a reputation for being a reliable vehicle, while the Mazda CX-9 has a less stellar reputation for reliability.
- Resale Value: The Subaru Outback typically holds its value better than the Mazda CX-9.
- Towing Capacity: The Subaru Outback has a towing capacity of 2,700 pounds, while the Mazda CX-9 has a towing capacity of 3,500 pounds.
- Off-Road Capability: The Subaru Outback is a more capable off-road vehicle than the Mazda CX-9.
Final Note: Making the Right Choice
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 are both excellent choices for families. The Outback is a more fuel-efficient and affordable option, while the CX-9 offers more power and a more spacious interior. Ultimately, the best SUV for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.
What People Want to Know
- Which SUV has more cargo space?
The Subaru Outback and Mazda CX-9 offer very similar cargo space. The Outback offers 35.4 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row of seats and 73.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the second row folded down. The CX-9 offers 36.1 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row of seats and 71.2 cubic feet of cargo space with the second row folded down.
- Which SUV is more fuel-efficient?
The Subaru Outback is more fuel-efficient than the Mazda CX-9. The Outback gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, while the CX-9 gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
- Which SUV has more standard safety features?
The Subaru Outback offers more standard safety features than the Mazda CX-9. The Outback comes standard with features such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, while the CX-9 does not.
