Compact suvs face off: subaru crosstrek and mazda cx-3, which is the ultimate choice?

Compact crossovers have become increasingly popular in recent years, offering a blend of versatility, fuel efficiency, and affordability. Among the top contenders in this segment are the Subaru Crosstrek and Mazda CX-3. Both vehicles boast unique strengths and appeal to different types of drivers. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key differences between the Subaru Crosstrek vs. Mazda CX-3 to help you make an informed decision.

Performance and Fuel Economy

The Subaru Crosstrek is powered by a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated boxer engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. The Mazda CX-3, on the other hand, features a smaller 2.0-liter naturally aspirated engine that generates 148 horsepower and 146 lb-ft of torque. In terms of acceleration, the Crosstrek has a slight edge, reaching 60 mph in 8.2 seconds compared to 8.7 seconds for the CX-3.

When it comes to fuel economy, the Crosstrek offers slightly better figures. With its standard all-wheel drive, the Crosstrek returns an EPA-estimated 27 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. The CX-3, with its front-wheel drive, has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 29 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway.

Handling and Off-Road Capability

The Subaru Crosstrek is renowned for its exceptional handling and off-road capabilities. Its Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system provides excellent traction and stability in all driving conditions. The Crosstrek also boasts 8.7 inches of ground clearance, allowing it to tackle rough terrain with ease.

The Mazda CX-3, while not as off-road-oriented as the Crosstrek, still offers decent handling and agility. Its G-Vectoring Control system helps improve cornering performance by transferring weight to the outside wheels during acceleration. The CX-3 has a ground clearance of 6.1 inches, which is sufficient for light off-road adventures.

Interior Space and Comfort

The Subaru Crosstrek offers a spacious and comfortable interior. The front seats provide ample headroom and legroom, while the rear seats can accommodate three adults with reasonable comfort. The Crosstrek also has a generous cargo capacity of 20.8 cubic feet behind the rear seats, which can be expanded to 55.3 cubic feet with the seats folded down.

The Mazda CX-3 has a more compact interior than the Crosstrek. The front seats are supportive and well-bolstered, but the rear seats are somewhat cramped for taller passengers. The CX-3’s cargo capacity is also smaller, at 12.1 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 42.3 cubic feet with the seats folded down.

Features and Technology

Both the Subaru Crosstrek and Mazda CX-3 offer a range of standard and optional features. The Crosstrek comes equipped with a 6.5-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a rearview camera, and a suite of safety features. Available features include a larger 8.0-inch touchscreen, navigation, a sunroof, and a Harman Kardon premium audio system.

The CX-3 also has a user-friendly infotainment system with a 7-inch touchscreen, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a rearview camera. Optional features include a Bose premium audio system, a sunroof, and a head-up display.

Safety

Both the Subaru Crosstrek and Mazda CX-3 have received high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The Crosstrek received a five-star overall safety rating from NHTSA, while the CX-3 earned a four-star overall safety rating. In IIHS testing, both vehicles earned “Good” ratings in all crashworthiness categories.

Price and Value

The Subaru Crosstrek has a starting price of $23,545, while the Mazda CX-3 starts at $21,900. In terms of value, the Crosstrek offers a more comprehensive package with its standard all-wheel drive, spacious interior, and excellent off-road capabilities. However, the CX-3 provides a more refined interior, better fuel economy, and a lower starting price.

Which Car is Right for You?

The Subaru Crosstrek is an excellent choice for drivers who prioritize off-road capability, spaciousness, and safety. Its all-wheel drive system, generous ground clearance, and extensive safety features make it a versatile and reliable vehicle for adventure-seekers and families alike.

The Mazda CX-3 is a good option for drivers who value fuel efficiency, a refined interior, and a lower price point. Its compact size, responsive handling, and available premium features make it a stylish and enjoyable daily driver.

In a nutshell

Ultimately, the best choice between the Subaru Crosstrek vs. Mazda CX-3 depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you need a vehicle that can handle rough terrain, offers ample space, and provides peace of mind on the road, the Crosstrek is the clear winner. If you prioritize fuel efficiency, a comfortable interior, and a lower cost, the CX-3 is a compelling choice.

Frequently Discussed Topics

1. Which car has a more powerful engine?

The Subaru Crosstrek has a more powerful engine, with 182 horsepower compared to 148 horsepower for the Mazda CX-3.

2. Which car has a better fuel economy?

The Mazda CX-3 has a slightly better fuel economy than the Subaru Crosstrek, with EPA-estimated ratings of 29 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway compared to 27 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway for the Crosstrek.

3. Which car has more interior space?

The Subaru Crosstrek has more interior space than the Mazda CX-3, with more headroom, legroom, and cargo capacity.

4. Which car has more safety features?

Both the Subaru Crosstrek and Mazda CX-3 offer a comprehensive suite of safety features, with the Crosstrek having a slight edge in terms of standard features.

5. Which car is more affordable?

The Mazda CX-3 has a lower starting price than the Subaru Crosstrek, starting at $21,900 compared to $23,545 for the Crosstrek.