What To Know
- For this price, buyers receive a compact and reliable vehicle with a spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and a host of safety features.
- The Spark, on the other hand, offers a more powerful engine and a slightly roomier interior, making it a better option for those who desire a bit more performance and space.
- The Mitsubishi Space Star has a more spacious interior, with ample room for five passengers and a generous amount of legroom and headroom.
When navigating the bustling streets of urban environments, choosing a compact and reliable vehicle is paramount. Two formidable contenders in this category are the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Chevrolet Spark. Both offer a compelling blend of practicality, fuel efficiency, and affordability. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two city dwellers, empowering you to make an informed decision.
Exterior Design
The Space Star exudes a sleek and modern aesthetic, boasting sharp lines and a spacious cabin. Its compact dimensions (3,845 mm in length) make it effortless to maneuver through tight spaces. In contrast, the Spark’s more rounded and playful design gives it a youthful and approachable character. It measures slightly shorter at 3,675 mm, providing excellent agility in urban settings.
Interior Space and Comfort
Despite their compact exteriors, both vehicles offer surprisingly spacious interiors. The Space Star’s tall roofline and wide cabin create a sense of roominess, accommodating five passengers with ease. Its seats provide ample support and adjustability, ensuring a comfortable ride. The Spark’s interior is equally impressive, featuring a well-organized layout and comfortable seating for four. However, its rear seats may feel cramped for taller passengers.
Engine Performance and Fuel Efficiency
Under the hood, the Space Star houses a 1.2-liter three-cylinder engine that generates 80 horsepower and 106 Nm of torque. Despite its modest output, the engine delivers responsive acceleration and impressive fuel efficiency. It boasts a combined fuel economy of 4.9 L/100 km, making it ideal for daily commutes and errands. The Spark, on the other hand, is powered by a 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 98 horsepower and 128 Nm of torque. While offering more power, its fuel consumption is slightly higher, with a combined rating of 6.1 L/100 km.
Handling and Safety
The Space Star’s agile handling and responsive steering make it a joy to drive in urban environments. Its suspension system strikes a balance between comfort and stability, providing a smooth and composed ride. In terms of safety, the Space Star features an array of advanced technologies, including anti-lock brakes (ABS), electronic stability control (ESC), and seven airbags. The Spark also offers nimble handling and a comfortable ride. Its safety features include ABS, ESC, and six airbags, ensuring peace of mind while on the road.
Technology and Features
Both the Space Star and the Spark come well-equipped with a range of technology and convenience features. The Space Star’s infotainment system features a 7-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, allowing for seamless integration with smartphones. It also boasts a rearview camera and cruise control. The Spark’s infotainment system includes a 7-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, as well as features such as a rearview camera and Bluetooth connectivity.
Pricing and Value
The Mitsubishi Space Star offers exceptional value for money, with a starting price of around €12,000. For this price, buyers receive a compact and reliable vehicle with a spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and a host of safety features. The Chevrolet Spark is slightly more expensive, with a starting price of around €14,000. However, it offers a more powerful engine and a slightly roomier interior.
Takeaways: Choosing the Right City Commuter
The Mitsubishi Space Star and the Chevrolet Spark are both excellent choices for city dwellers seeking a compact and economical vehicle. The Space Star excels in terms of fuel efficiency, spaciousness, and affordability, making it an ideal choice for those prioritizing practicality and value. The Spark, on the other hand, offers a more powerful engine and a slightly roomier interior, making it a better option for those who desire a bit more performance and space. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences and budget.
Top Questions Asked
Q: Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Mitsubishi Space Star has better fuel efficiency, with a combined rating of 4.9 L/100 km compared to the Spark’s 6.1 L/100 km.
Q: Which vehicle has a more spacious interior?
A: The Mitsubishi Space Star has a more spacious interior, with ample room for five passengers and a generous amount of legroom and headroom.
Q: Which vehicle has a more powerful engine?
A: The Chevrolet Spark has a more powerful engine, with a 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 98 horsepower compared to the Space Star’s 1.2-liter three-cylinder engine that produces 80 horsepower.