What To Know
- The Mazda CX-5 with its naturally aspirated engine has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
- The Subaru Forester with its turbocharged engine offers slightly lower fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
- The Mazda CX-5 offers slightly better fuel economy than the Subaru Forester in snowy conditions, with an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
When it comes to navigating snowy roads, two vehicles that stand out as exceptional performers are the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester. Both SUVs offer impressive capabilities on slippery surfaces, but which one reigns supreme in the realm of winter driving? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of the CX-5 and Forester to determine which one emerges as the superior choice for tackling snowy conditions.
Ground Clearance and AWD Systems
Ground clearance is crucial for traversing snow-covered roads. The Mazda CX-5 boasts a ground clearance of 8.6 inches, while the Subaru Forester offers a slightly higher 8.7 inches. Both vehicles provide ample ground clearance to clear snowdrifts and avoid underbody damage.
Both the CX-5 and the Forester are equipped with advanced all-wheel drive (AWD) systems. The CX-5 features the i-ACTIV AWD system, which monitors road conditions and distributes torque to the wheels with the most traction. The Forester, on the other hand, utilizes the Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, renowned for its stability and grip in all-weather conditions.
Engine Performance
In snowy conditions, engine power can make a significant difference. The Mazda CX-5 is available with a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine that produces 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque. The Subaru Forester offers a more powerful 2.5-liter turbocharged engine that generates 182 horsepower and 241 lb-ft of torque.
The turbocharged engine in the Forester provides an advantage in terms of acceleration and passing power on snowy roads. However, the CX-5’s naturally aspirated engine offers greater fuel efficiency, which can be beneficial during long winter drives.
Winter-Specific Features
Both the CX-5 and the Forester offer a range of winter-specific features to enhance their performance in snowy conditions. The CX-5 comes standard with heated front seats, a heated steering wheel, and remote engine start. The Forester goes a step further by offering heated rear seats and a heated windshield, providing maximum comfort for all occupants.
Safety and Traction Control
Safety is paramount in snowy conditions. The CX-5 and the Forester both excel in this area, having earned top safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
Both vehicles feature a comprehensive suite of traction control systems, including electronic stability control, traction control, and anti-lock brakes. These systems work together to maintain stability and prevent skidding on slippery surfaces.
Fuel Economy
Fuel economy is an important consideration for any vehicle, especially during winter when fuel consumption tends to increase. The Mazda CX-5 with its naturally aspirated engine has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway. The Subaru Forester with its turbocharged engine offers slightly lower fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
Interior Space and Comfort
Interior space and comfort are essential for long winter drives. The CX-5 offers a spacious cabin with ample headroom and legroom for all passengers. The Forester has a slightly larger cabin, providing more room for cargo and bulky winter gear.
Both vehicles feature comfortable seats with supportive cushions and adjustable lumbar support. The CX-5 offers a more premium interior with higher-quality materials and a more modern design.
Final Thoughts
After carefully comparing the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester, it becomes evident that both vehicles are highly capable in snowy conditions. The CX-5 offers a combination of fuel efficiency, premium interior, and a well-rounded performance. The Forester, on the other hand, shines with its more powerful engine, heated windshield, and slightly larger cabin.
Ultimately, the best choice between the CX-5 and the Forester depends on individual preferences and priorities. For those seeking a fuel-efficient and stylish SUV with excellent handling, the Mazda CX-5 is an ideal choice. If a more powerful engine, heated windshield, and spacious cabin are desired, the Subaru Forester is the better option.
Common Questions and Answers
Q: Which vehicle has a better fuel economy in snowy conditions?
A: The Mazda CX-5 offers slightly better fuel economy than the Subaru Forester in snowy conditions, with an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which vehicle has a more spacious cabin?
A: The Subaru Forester has a slightly larger cabin than the Mazda CX-5, providing more room for cargo and bulky winter gear.
Q: Which vehicle has a more advanced AWD system?
A: Both the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester have advanced AWD systems, but the Subaru’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system is generally considered to be more capable in off-road and snowy conditions.