What To Know
- The Ninja 300 features a trellis frame with a 41mm telescopic fork at the front and a Uni-Trak monoshock at the rear.
- The Ninja 300 comes equipped with dual 290mm petal discs at the front and a single 220mm disc at the rear, while the RC 390 boasts a single 320mm disc with a four-piston caliper at the front and a 230mm disc at the rear.
- The KTM RC 390 has a slight edge in top speed, but the Kawasaki Ninja 300 provides a more linear and predictable power delivery.
The adrenaline-pumping world of motorcycling witnesses a fierce rivalry between two legendary superbikes: the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the KTM RC 390. Both machines boast impressive specs and loyal fan bases, making the choice between them a tantalizing dilemma. This comprehensive comparison delves into every aspect of these superbikes, helping you determine which one reigns supreme.
Performance and Power
The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is powered by a 296cc parallel-twin engine that delivers 39 horsepower at 11,000 rpm and 21 lb-ft of torque at 10,000 rpm. The KTM RC 390, on the other hand, packs a larger 373cc single-cylinder engine that generates 43 horsepower at 9,500 rpm and 26 lb-ft of torque at 7,250 rpm. While the RC 390 has a slight edge in horsepower, the Ninja 300’s twin-cylinder configuration provides a smoother power delivery and better throttle response.
Handling and Suspension
The Ninja 300 features a trellis frame with a 41mm telescopic fork at the front and a Uni-Trak monoshock at the rear. The RC 390’s frame is a lightweight steel trellis, complemented by a 43mm WP Apex upside-down fork and a WP Apex monoshock. Both bikes offer excellent handling, but the RC 390’s stiffer suspension and aggressive geometry lend it a more track-oriented feel.
Braking and Safety
The Ninja 300 comes equipped with dual 290mm petal discs at the front and a single 220mm disc at the rear, while the RC 390 boasts a single 320mm disc with a four-piston caliper at the front and a 230mm disc at the rear. The RC 390’s larger front disc and four-piston caliper provide superior stopping power and confidence-inspiring braking performance. Both bikes include ABS as standard.
Design and Styling
The Ninja 300 flaunts a sleek and sporty design with a full fairing and a sharp, angular headlight. The RC 390, in contrast, adopts a more aggressive and angular appearance with a sharp-edged fairing and a distinctive split headlight. Both bikes offer a comfortable and ergonomic riding position, although the Ninja 300’s taller windscreen provides better wind protection.
Features and Technology
The Ninja 300’s instrument cluster includes an analog tachometer and a digital speedometer, while the RC 390 features a fully digital TFT display with Bluetooth connectivity and smartphone integration. The RC 390 also offers a quickshifter as an optional extra, providing smoother and faster gear changes.
Price and Value
The Kawasaki Ninja 300 has a starting price of around $4,999, while the KTM RC 390 starts at $5,799. The RC 390’s higher price point reflects its more advanced features and technology, but the Ninja 300 offers a compelling value proposition with its proven performance and reliability.
Key Points
The choice between the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the KTM RC 390 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize smoothness, reliability, and a comfortable riding experience, the Ninja 300 is an excellent choice. However, if you crave adrenaline-pumping performance, sharp handling, and cutting-edge technology, the KTM RC 390 will not disappoint.
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
1. Which bike is faster?
The KTM RC 390 has a slight edge in top speed, but the Kawasaki Ninja 300 provides a more linear and predictable power delivery.
2. Which bike has better handling?
Both bikes offer excellent handling, but the KTM RC 390’s stiffer suspension and aggressive geometry give it an advantage on the track.
3. Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
The Kawasaki Ninja 300’s taller windscreen and more upright riding position make it more suitable for long-distance riding.