The Ford Ranger Vs. Gmc Canyon: Which Is The Better Midsize Pickup Truck?

What To Know

  • The GMC Canyon, on the other hand, offers a slightly higher payload capacity of 1,880 pounds but falls behind in towing capacity, with a maximum rating of 7,000 pounds.
  • Both the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon offer a suite of advanced driver assistance systems to enhance safety and peace of mind on the road.
  • The GMC Canyon, on the other hand, provides a slightly higher payload capacity and a more spacious cabin, along with a slightly better ground clearance for off-road adventures.

In the realm of midsize pickup trucks, two titans stand tall, each boasting a formidable reputation for ruggedness, versatility, and capability. The Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon have long been the subject of heated debates, with ardent supporters on both sides. This comprehensive analysis delves into the intricacies of these two formidable contenders, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and defining characteristics to determine which emerges as the superior choice.

A Tale of Two Engines: Power and Efficiency Under the Hood

The Ford Ranger offers a choice of two potent powertrains. The standard 2.3-liter EcoBoost turbocharged four-cylinder engine delivers a respectable 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque, providing ample muscle for most tasks. For those seeking even more brawn, the available 3.0-liter Power Stroke turbodiesel V6 cranks out a stout 250 horsepower and a colossal 440 lb-ft of torque, transforming the Ranger into a veritable towing and hauling powerhouse.

The GMC Canyon, on the other hand, comes standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces a modest 200 horsepower and 191 lb-ft of torque. While adequate for light-duty tasks, this engine may struggle under heavier loads or when tackling challenging terrains. Fortunately, GMC offers a more potent 3.6-liter V6 engine that generates a robust 308 horsepower and 275 lb-ft of torque, providing a significant boost in performance and towing capacity.

Conquering the Toughest Terrains: Off-Road Prowess

When the pavement ends and the trail begins, both the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon demonstrate their off-road prowess. The Ranger’s FX4 Off-Road Package equips it with rugged all-terrain tires, an upgraded suspension system, and a terrain management system with four distinct modes for optimal traction in varying conditions. Additionally, the Ranger boasts an impressive ground clearance of 8.9 inches, allowing it to navigate rough terrain with ease.

The GMC Canyon’s AT4 Off-Road Package offers comparable capabilities, featuring all-terrain tires, a lifted suspension, and a transfer case with low-range gearing for tackling steep inclines and treacherous descents. With a ground clearance of 9.6 inches, the Canyon provides slightly better clearance for navigating obstacles.

The Art of Hauling and Towing: Payload and Towing Capacities

When it comes to hauling and towing, both the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon deliver impressive capabilities. The Ranger’s maximum payload capacity reaches 1,860 pounds, while its maximum towing capacity stands at 7,500 pounds when properly equipped. The GMC Canyon, on the other hand, offers a slightly higher payload capacity of 1,880 pounds but falls behind in towing capacity, with a maximum rating of 7,000 pounds.

Creature Comforts: A Refined Cabin Experience

Inside the cabin, the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon provide a comfortable and well-equipped environment. The Ranger’s interior features a user-friendly infotainment system with a touchscreen display, supportive seats, and ample storage compartments. The Canyon’s cabin offers similar amenities, including a user-friendly infotainment system, comfortable seating, and plenty of storage space.

Safety First: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

Both the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon offer a suite of advanced driver assistance systems to enhance safety and peace of mind on the road. These systems include features such as lane departure warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and blind-spot monitoring.

Fuel Efficiency: The Art of Balancing Power and Economy

In terms of fuel efficiency, the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon deliver comparable results. The Ranger’s 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine returns an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the 3.0-liter Power Stroke turbodiesel V6 achieves an impressive 23 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway. The GMC Canyon’s 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine offers an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the 3.6-liter V6 returns 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway.

The Ultimate Verdict: A Matter of Personal Preference

Ultimately, the choice between the Ford Ranger and GMC Canyon boils down to personal preference and specific needs. The Ford Ranger offers a more powerful engine lineup, particularly with the available 3.0-liter Power Stroke turbodiesel V6, and slightly better towing capacity. The GMC Canyon, on the other hand, provides a slightly higher payload capacity and a more spacious cabin, along with a slightly better ground clearance for off-road adventures.

What You Need to Know

Q: Which truck has a higher towing capacity?

A: The Ford Ranger has a slightly higher towing capacity of 7,500 pounds compared to the GMC Canyon‘s 7,000 pounds.

Q: Which truck has a more spacious cabin?

A: The GMC Canyon offers a slightly more spacious cabin with more headroom and legroom compared to the Ford Ranger.

Q: Which truck has a better fuel economy?

A: The Ford Ranger‘s 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine offers slightly better fuel economy than the GMC Canyon’s 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, with EPA-estimated ratings of 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway compared to 20 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, respectively.