What To Know
- In terms of power, the Apache 160 4V has a slight edge over the Hornet 2.
- 0 exudes a muscular and imposing presence, while the Apache 160 4V has a sleek and aerodynamic profile.
- 0 offers a more muscular design, while the Apache 160 4V has a slight edge in power and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Indian motorcycle market is a competitive landscape with an array of options available to riders. Two prominent contenders in the 160cc segment are the Honda Hornet 2.0 and the Apache 160 4V. This blog post delves into a comprehensive comparison of these two motorcycles, analyzing their specifications, performance, features, and value for money to help you make an informed decision.
Engine and Performance:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- 184.9cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine
- Maximum power: 17.26 hp at 8500 rpm
- Maximum torque: 16.1 Nm at 6000 rpm
- Fuel injection system
Apache 160 4V:
- 160cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine
- Maximum power: 17.63 hp at 9000 rpm
- Maximum torque: 14.8 Nm at 7250 rpm
- Fuel injection system
In terms of power, the Apache 160 4V has a slight edge over the Hornet 2.0. However, the Hornet 2.0’s torque is marginally higher, providing better low-end acceleration. Both motorcycles feature fuel injection systems for improved fuel efficiency and performance.
Design and Styling:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- Modern and muscular design
- Sharp lines and aggressive styling
- LED headlight and taillight
- Digital instrument cluster
Apache 160 4V:
- Sporty and aerodynamic design
- Racetrack-inspired graphics
- LED headlight and taillight
- LCD instrument cluster
The Hornet 2.0 exudes a muscular and imposing presence, while the Apache 160 4V has a sleek and aerodynamic profile. Both motorcycles feature LED lighting for enhanced visibility, and their digital instrument clusters provide comprehensive information.
Features:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- Single-channel ABS
- Hazard lights
- Engine kill switch
- Pass switch
Apache 160 4V:
- Single-channel ABS
- Hazard lights
- Engine kill switch
- Pass switch
- Bluetooth connectivity
The Hornet 2.0 and Apache 160 4V offer similar basic features such as ABS, hazard lights, and engine kill switches. However, the Apache 160 4V stands out with its Bluetooth connectivity, allowing riders to pair their smartphones for music, navigation, and call functions.
Ride and Handling:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- Telescopic front forks
- Monoshock rear suspension
- Tubeless tires
- 140/70-17 rear tire
Apache 160 4V:
- Telescopic front forks
- Monoshock rear suspension
- Tubeless tires
- 130/70-17 rear tire
Both motorcycles feature telescopic front forks and monoshock rear suspensions. The Hornet 2.0 has a wider 140/70-17 rear tire compared to the Apache 160 4V’s 130/70-17 rear tire, providing better grip and stability.
Fuel Efficiency and Mileage:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- Claimed fuel efficiency: 45 kmpl
Apache 160 4V:
- Claimed fuel efficiency: 45 kmpl
Both the Hornet 2.0 and Apache 160 4V have similar claimed fuel efficiency figures of 45 kmpl. Real-world mileage may vary depending on riding conditions and individual riding styles.
Price and Value for Money:
Honda Hornet 2.0:
- Price (ex-showroom, Delhi): Rs. 1,28,834
Apache 160 4V:
- Price (ex-showroom, Delhi): Rs. 1,17,890
The Apache 160 4V is priced slightly lower than the Hornet 2.0. Considering the additional features such as Bluetooth connectivity, the Apache 160 4V offers better value for money.
Verdict:
The Honda Hornet 2.0 and Apache 160 4V are both capable and feature-rich motorcycles in the 160cc segment. The Hornet 2.0 offers a more muscular design, while the Apache 160 4V has a slight edge in power and Bluetooth connectivity. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences, budget, and riding style.
What You Need to Learn
Q1. Which motorcycle is more powerful, the Hornet 2.0 or the Apache 160 4V?
A1. The Apache 160 4V has marginally more power than the Hornet 2.0.
Q2. Does the Hornet 2.0 have Bluetooth connectivity?
A2. No, the Hornet 2.0 does not have Bluetooth connectivity.
Q3. Which motorcycle has a wider rear tire?
A3. The Hornet 2.0 has a wider 140/70-17 rear tire compared to the Apache 160 4V’s 130/70-17 rear tire.
Q4. Which motorcycle is more fuel-efficient?
A4. Both the Hornet 2.0 and Apache 160 4V have claimed fuel efficiency figures of 45 kmpl.
Q5. Which motorcycle is better for city riding?
A5. Both motorcycles are well-suited for city riding, offering a balance of performance and maneuverability.