What To Know
- The Mazda 3, on the other hand, is more fuel-efficient, getting an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway compared to the Accord’s 23 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway.
- The Mazda 3, on the other hand, has a more modern and stylish interior design, with a focus on sportiness and luxury.
- The Mazda 3, on the other hand, has a more upscale interior design and offers more features, such as a Bose sound system and a sunroof.
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 are two of the most popular compact cars on the market. They offer a great combination of fuel efficiency, performance, and features. But which one is the right choice for you? In this blog post, we’ll compare the Honda Accord and Mazda 3 head-to-head to help you make a decision.
Performance
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 both offer a variety of engine options. The Accord comes standard with a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 192 horsepower and 192 lb-ft of torque. The Mazda 3 comes standard with a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 155 horsepower and 150 lb-ft of torque.
In terms of performance, the Accord has a slight edge over the Mazda 3. The Accord’s turbocharged engine provides more power and torque, which makes it quicker off the line and more responsive at highway speeds. The Mazda 3, on the other hand, is more fuel-efficient, getting an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway compared to the Accord’s 23 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway.
Handling
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 both offer excellent handling. The Accord is known for its smooth ride and responsive steering, while the Mazda 3 is known for its agile handling and sporty feel.
In terms of handling, the Mazda 3 has a slight edge over the Accord. The Mazda 3’s smaller size and lighter weight make it more nimble and easier to maneuver. The Accord, on the other hand, offers a more comfortable ride and is better suited for long road trips.
Interior
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 both offer spacious and well-appointed interiors. The Accord has a more traditional interior design, with a focus on comfort and functionality. The Mazda 3, on the other hand, has a more modern and stylish interior design, with a focus on sportiness and luxury.
In terms of interior space, the Accord has a slight edge over the Mazda 3. The Accord offers more headroom, legroom, and cargo space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3, on the other hand, has a more upscale interior design and offers more features, such as a Bose sound system and a sunroof.
Safety
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 both offer a variety of safety features. The Accord comes standard with a suite of safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control. The Mazda 3 comes standard with a similar suite of safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and blind spot monitoring.
In terms of safety, the Accord and Mazda 3 are both very close. Both cars have received high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
Price
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 are both priced competitively. The Accord starts at $24,970, while the Mazda 3 starts at $23,645.
In terms of price, the Mazda 3 has a slight edge over the Accord. The Mazda 3 is available in a wider range of trim levels, which gives buyers more options to choose from. The Accord, on the other hand, offers more standard features than the Mazda 3, which makes it a better value for the money.
Which One is Right for You?
The Honda Accord and Mazda 3 are both great compact cars that offer a lot of value for the money. The Accord is a better choice for buyers who are looking for a comfortable and fuel-efficient car with a spacious interior. The Mazda 3 is a better choice for buyers who are looking for a sporty and stylish car with a fun-to-drive personality.
The Verdict
After comparing the Honda Accord and Mazda 3 head-to-head, we’ve come to the conclusion that both cars are excellent choices in the compact car segment. The Accord is a better choice for buyers who prioritize comfort, fuel efficiency, and interior space. The Mazda 3 is a better choice for buyers who prioritize sportiness, style, and fun-to-drive personality.
Questions We Hear a Lot
Q: Which car has better fuel economy, the Honda Accord or the Mazda 3?
A: The Mazda 3 has better fuel economy than the Honda Accord. The Mazda 3 gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, compared to the Accord’s 23 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which car has more cargo space, the Honda Accord or the Mazda 3?
A: The Honda Accord has more cargo space than the Mazda 3. The Accord offers 16.7 cubic feet of cargo space, compared to the Mazda 3’s 13.2 cubic feet.
Q: Which car has a more powerful engine, the Honda Accord or the Mazda 3?
A: The Honda Accord has a more powerful engine than the Mazda 3. The Accord’s turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine produces 192 horsepower and 192 lb-ft of torque, compared to the Mazda 3’s 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, which produces 155 horsepower and 150 lb-ft of torque.