What To Know
- In this blog post, we will compare the Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee in terms of performance, fuel efficiency, towing and payload capacity, interior features, safety features, and price.
- The Ranger’s EcoBoost engine gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the Power Stroke diesel engine gets an EPA-estimated 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
- The Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee both offer a variety of interior features, including a touchscreen infotainment system, a rearview camera, and a variety of driver assistance features.
The Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee are two of the most popular midsize pickup trucks on the market. Both offer a variety of features and capabilities, making them ideal for a variety of needs. But which one is the better choice for you? In this blog post, we will compare the Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee in terms of performance, fuel efficiency, towing and payload capacity, interior features, safety features, and price. We will also provide a FAQ section to answer some of the most common questions about these two vehicles.
Performance
The Ford Ranger is available with two engine options: a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine and a 3.0-liter Power Stroke V6 diesel engine. The EcoBoost engine produces 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque, while the Power Stroke engine produces 250 horsepower and 440 lb-ft of torque. The Jeep Cherokee is available with three engine options: a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, a 2.4-liter Tigershark MultiAir four-cylinder engine, and a 3.2-liter Pentastar V6 engine. The 2.0-liter turbocharged engine produces 270 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, the 2.4-liter Tigershark engine produces 180 horsepower and 171 lb-ft of torque, and the 3.2-liter Pentastar engine produces 271 horsepower and 239 lb-ft of torque.
In terms of performance, the Ford Ranger has a slight edge over the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger’s EcoBoost engine produces more horsepower and torque than the Cherokee’s 2.0-liter turbocharged engine, and the Ranger’s Power Stroke diesel engine produces more torque than any of the Cherokee’s engines. This gives the Ranger a better towing and payload capacity, as well as a better off-road performance.
Fuel Efficiency
The Ford Ranger gets better fuel economy than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger’s EcoBoost engine gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the Power Stroke diesel engine gets an EPA-estimated 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway. The Jeep Cherokee’s 2.0-liter turbocharged engine gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway, the 2.4-liter Tigershark engine gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, and the 3.2-liter Pentastar engine gets an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
Overall, the Ford Ranger has a better fuel economy than the Jeep Cherokee. This is due to the Ranger’s more efficient EcoBoost engine and Power Stroke diesel engine.
Towing and Payload Capacity
The Ford Ranger has a better towing and payload capacity than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger can tow up to 7,500 pounds and has a payload capacity of up to 1,860 pounds. The Jeep Cherokee can tow up to 4,500 pounds and has a payload capacity of up to 1,400 pounds.
This makes the Ranger a better choice for those who need to tow or haul heavy loads.
Interior Features
The Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee both offer a variety of interior features, including a touchscreen infotainment system, a rearview camera, and a variety of driver assistance features. However, the Ranger has a more spacious interior than the Cherokee. The Ranger offers more headroom, legroom, and shoulder room than the Cherokee, making it a more comfortable choice for long road trips.
Safety Features
Both the Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee offer a variety of safety features, including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control. However, the Ranger has a slightly higher safety rating than the Cherokee. The Ranger received a five-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), while the Cherokee received a four-star overall safety rating.
Price
The Ford Ranger has a lower starting price than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger starts at $24,820, while the Cherokee starts at $26,995. However, the Ranger’s price can quickly increase depending on the trim level and options that you choose. The top-of-the-line Ranger Lariat Tremor starts at $43,870, while the top-of-the-line Cherokee Trailhawk starts at $38,995.
Overall, the Ford Ranger is a better value than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger offers more performance, fuel efficiency, towing and payload capacity, interior space, and safety features for a lower price.
The Final Verdict
So, which is the better choice for you, the Ford Ranger or the Jeep Cherokee? The answer to that question depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you need a truck that can tow and haul heavy loads, the Ranger is the better choice. If you need a truck with a spacious interior and a variety of safety features, the Ranger is also the better choice. However, if you are looking for a truck with a lower starting price, the Cherokee is the better choice.
The End
We hope this blog post has helped you learn more about the Ford Ranger and Jeep Cherokee. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment below.
Basics You Wanted To Know
Q: Which truck has a better towing and payload capacity, the Ford Ranger or the Jeep Cherokee?
A: The Ford Ranger has a better towing and payload capacity than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger can tow up to 7,500 pounds and has a payload capacity of up to 1,860 pounds, while the Cherokee can tow up to 4,500 pounds and has a payload capacity of up to 1,400 pounds.
Q: Which truck gets better fuel economy, the Ford Ranger or the Jeep Cherokee?
A: The Ford Ranger gets better fuel economy than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger’s EcoBoost engine gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the Power Stroke diesel engine gets an EPA-estimated 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway. The Cherokee’s 2.0-liter turbocharged engine gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway, the 2.4-liter Tigershark engine gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, and the 3.2-liter Pentastar engine gets an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which truck has a more spacious interior, the Ford Ranger or the Jeep Cherokee?
A: The Ford Ranger has a more spacious interior than the Jeep Cherokee. The Ranger offers more headroom, legroom, and shoulder room than the Cherokee, making it a more comfortable choice for long road trips.