What To Know
- 2 Duratorq engine has a maximum towing capacity of 6,500 pounds and a maximum payload capacity of 1,630 pounds.
- 2 Duratorq engine is a better choice for drivers who are looking for a more affordable truck that is still capable of handling most tasks.
- Ultimately, the best way to decide which engine is right for you is to test drive both the 2.
The Ford Ranger is a popular pickup truck that is known for its versatility, capability, and affordability. It is available with two different engine options: a 2.0-liter EcoBlue diesel engine and a 3.2-liter Duratorq diesel engine. Both engines have their own advantages and disadvantages, so it is important to carefully consider which one is right for you before making a purchase.
Engine Specifications
| Feature | 2.0 EcoBlue | 3.2 Duratorq |
| — | — | — |
| Engine Type | Turbocharged 4-cylinder diesel | Turbocharged 5-cylinder diesel |
| Displacement | 1996 cc | 3198 cc |
| Power | 210 hp @ 3750 rpm | 200 hp @ 3000 rpm |
| Torque | 369 lb-ft @ 1750-2500 rpm | 347 lb-ft @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 23/30 mpg | 20/27 mpg |
Performance
The 2.0 EcoBlue engine produces more power and torque than the 3.2 Duratorq engine. This makes it a better choice for drivers who need a truck that can tow heavy loads or go off-road. The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is also more fuel-efficient than the 3.2 Duratorq engine, so it can save you money on gas in the long run.
Towing and Payload Capacity
The 2.0 EcoBlue engine has a maximum towing capacity of 7,500 pounds and a maximum payload capacity of 1,860 pounds. The 3.2 Duratorq engine has a maximum towing capacity of 6,500 pounds and a maximum payload capacity of 1,630 pounds.
Off-Road Capability
The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is better suited for off-road driving than the 3.2 Duratorq engine. It has a lower center of gravity, which makes it more stable on uneven terrain. It also has a better approach angle and departure angle, which makes it easier to climb over obstacles.
Price
The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is more expensive than the 3.2 Duratorq engine. The price difference varies depending on the trim level and options that you choose, but it can be as much as $2,000.
Which One is Right for You?
The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is the better choice for drivers who need a truck that can tow heavy loads, go off-road, or get good fuel economy. The 3.2 Duratorq engine is a better choice for drivers who are looking for a more affordable truck that is still capable of handling most tasks.
Wrapping Up: Making the Right Decision
Ultimately, the best way to decide which engine is right for you is to test drive both the 2.0 EcoBlue and 3.2 Duratorq engines. This will give you a chance to experience the difference in performance, towing and payload capacity, off-road capability, and price. Once you have driven both engines, you will be able to make an informed decision about which one is the best fit for your needs and budget.
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
Q: Which engine is more powerful?
A: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine produces more power and torque than the 3.2 Duratorq engine.
Q: Which engine is more fuel-efficient?
A: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is more fuel-efficient than the 3.2 Duratorq engine.
Q: Which engine has a higher towing capacity?
A: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine has a higher towing capacity than the 3.2 Duratorq engine.
Q: Which engine is better for off-road driving?
A: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is better for off-road driving than the 3.2 Duratorq engine.
Q: Which engine is more expensive?
A: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is more expensive than the 3.2 Duratorq engine.