What To Know
- 2 engine, on the other hand, is a 5-cylinder turbocharged diesel that generates 200 horsepower and 347 lb-ft of torque.
- It delivers an impressive fuel economy of up to 28 mpg combined, making it an economical choice for long-distance travel and daily commutes.
- 2 boasts a higher payload capacity of 2,250 pounds and a maximum towing capacity of 7,700 pounds.
The Ford Ranger is a renowned pickup truck that has captivated the hearts of adventurers and commercial drivers alike. When it comes to engine options, the Ranger offers two formidable choices: the 2.0 EcoBlue and the 3.2. But which one emerges as the superior choice? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the intricacies of both engines, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for different needs.
Power and Performance
2.0 EcoBlue: The 2.0 EcoBlue engine is a 4-cylinder turbocharged diesel that produces 210 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque. It offers impressive acceleration and towing capabilities, making it a capable workhorse for both light and heavy-duty tasks.
3.2: The 3.2 engine, on the other hand, is a 5-cylinder turbocharged diesel that generates 200 horsepower and 347 lb-ft of torque. While it may have slightly lower horsepower than the EcoBlue, it compensates with its brawny torque, delivering exceptional low-end pulling power.
Fuel Efficiency
2.0 EcoBlue: The EcoBlue engine is renowned for its fuel efficiency, thanks to its advanced turbocharging and direct injection technologies. It delivers an impressive fuel economy of up to 28 mpg combined, making it an economical choice for long-distance travel and daily commutes.
3.2: The 3.2 engine is less fuel-efficient than the EcoBlue, with an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 22 mpg combined. However, its superior torque allows for more effortless towing, which can indirectly improve fuel efficiency by reducing strain on the drivetrain.
Off-Road Capability
2.0 EcoBlue: The Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue is available with an optional FX4 Off-Road Package, which enhances its off-road capabilities with features such as skid plates, off-road tires, and an electronically locking rear differential.
3.2: The Ranger 3.2 also offers a Tremor Off-Road Package, which includes even more aggressive upgrades, including Fox Racing shocks, 33-inch all-terrain tires, and a heavy-duty front bumper.
Payload and Towing Capacity
2.0 EcoBlue: The Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue has a maximum payload capacity of 1,860 pounds and a maximum towing capacity of 7,500 pounds.
3.2: The Ranger 3.2 boasts a higher payload capacity of 2,250 pounds and a maximum towing capacity of 7,700 pounds.
Price and Availability
2.0 EcoBlue: The Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue is available in various trim levels, with prices starting from around $32,000.
3.2: The Ranger 3.2 is offered in fewer trim levels and has a higher starting price of around $39,000.
Which Engine is Right for You?
The choice between the Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue and 3.2 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences.
Choose the 2.0 EcoBlue if:
- Fuel efficiency is a priority
- You frequently tow lighter loads
- You prefer a more modern and refined engine
Choose the 3.2 if:
- You require exceptional low-end torque
- You regularly tow heavy loads
- You prioritize off-road capability
Wrapping Up
Both the Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue and 3.2 engines offer unique strengths and capabilities. The EcoBlue is the more fuel-efficient and modern option, while the 3.2 provides superior torque and off-road prowess. By carefully considering your driving habits and requirements, you can make an informed decision and choose the engine that best suits your needs.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q: Which engine is more reliable?
A: Both the 2.0 EcoBlue and 3.2 engines have proven to be reliable, with no significant reported issues.
Q: Does the 2.0 EcoBlue have a turbo lag?
A: The EcoBlue engine has minimal turbo lag, thanks to its advanced turbocharging system.
Q: Can the 3.2 engine be tuned for more power?
A: Yes, the 3.2 engine has a strong aftermarket support, and tuning options are available to enhance its performance.