Efficiency & Adventure Collide: Ford Maverick Hybrid Vs Subaru Outback Wilderness: Which One Reigns Supreme?
What To Know
- By the end of this post, you’ll have a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle and be able to make an informed decision about which one is right for you.
- However, the Outback Wilderness has a slight edge in terms of safety features, as it comes standard with a wider range of active safety features than the Maverick.
- If you’re looking for a crossover with a more comprehensive list of features and a better safety rating, the Subaru Outback Wilderness is a better option.
The Ford Maverick and Subaru Outback Wilderness are two of the most popular compact crossovers on the market. Both vehicles offer a variety of features and benefits that make them appealing to a wide range of drivers. However, there are also some key differences between the two vehicles that shoppers should be aware of before making a purchase decision.
In this blog post, we’ll compare the Ford Maverick and Subaru Outback Wilderness head-to-head in a number of key areas, including:
- Price
- Fuel efficiency
- Performance
- Towing and payload capacity
- Interior space
- Features
- Safety
By the end of this post, you’ll have a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle and be able to make an informed decision about which one is right for you.
Price
The Ford Maverick has a starting price of $21,490, while the Subaru Outback Wilderness starts at $38,145. This is a significant difference in price, and it’s important to consider your budget before making a decision.
Fuel Efficiency
The Ford Maverick gets an EPA-estimated 42 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. The Subaru Outback Wilderness gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway. This means that the Maverick is significantly more fuel-efficient than the Outback Wilderness.
Performance
The Ford Maverick is powered by a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 250 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque. The Subaru Outback Wilderness is powered by a 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 260 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque. Both vehicles come standard with all-wheel drive.
In terms of performance, the Maverick and Outback Wilderness are very similar. Both vehicles offer plenty of power and acceleration, and they both handle well. However, the Maverick has a slightly better towing and payload capacity than the Outback Wilderness.
Towing and Payload Capacity
The Ford Maverick can tow up to 4,000 pounds and has a payload capacity of 1,500 pounds. The Subaru Outback Wilderness can tow up to 3,500 pounds and has a payload capacity of 1,300 pounds.
Interior Space
The Ford Maverick has a spacious interior with plenty of room for passengers and cargo. The Subaru Outback Wilderness has a slightly smaller interior, but it still offers plenty of room for most people.
Features
The Ford Maverick comes standard with a variety of features, including a touchscreen infotainment system, a rearview camera, and a suite of safety features. The Subaru Outback Wilderness comes standard with a more comprehensive list of features, including a larger touchscreen infotainment system, a sunroof, and a heated steering wheel.
Safety
Both the Ford Maverick and Subaru Outback Wilderness have received good safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). However, the Outback Wilderness has a slight edge in terms of safety features, as it comes standard with a wider range of active safety features than the Maverick.
Which Vehicle is Right for You?
The Ford Maverick and Subaru Outback Wilderness are both excellent compact crossovers with a lot to offer. The Maverick is a more affordable option with better fuel efficiency and a higher towing and payload capacity. The Outback Wilderness has a more comprehensive list of features and a better safety rating.
Ultimately, the best vehicle for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly crossover with good fuel efficiency and towing capacity, the Ford Maverick is a great choice. If you’re looking for a crossover with a more comprehensive list of features and a better safety rating, the Subaru Outback Wilderness is a better option.
The Verdict: Ford Maverick vs Outback Wilderness
The Ford Maverick and Subaru Outback Wilderness are both excellent compact crossovers, but they offer different things to different drivers. The Maverick is a more affordable option with better fuel efficiency and a higher towing and payload capacity. The Outback Wilderness has a more comprehensive list of features and a better safety rating.
Ultimately, the best vehicle for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly crossover with good fuel efficiency and towing capacity, the Ford Maverick is a great choice. If you’re looking for a crossover with a more comprehensive list of features and a better safety rating, the Subaru Outback Wilderness is a better option.
Top Questions Asked
Q: Which vehicle has a better fuel economy?
A: The Ford Maverick has a better fuel economy than the Subaru Outback Wilderness. The Maverick gets an EPA-estimated 42 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the Outback Wilderness gets an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which vehicle has a more powerful engine?
A: The Subaru Outback Wilderness has a more powerful engine than the Ford Maverick. The Outback Wilderness is powered by a 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 260 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque, while the Maverick is powered by a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 250 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque.
Q: Which vehicle has a higher towing capacity?
A: The Ford Maverick has a higher towing capacity than the Subaru Outback Wilderness. The Maverick can tow up to 4,000 pounds, while the Outback Wilderness can tow up to 3,500 pounds.
