What To Know
- The Bajaj Pulsar N160 claims a mileage of 50 kmpl, while the Honda X-Blade boasts a slightly higher mileage of 55 kmpl.
- The Pulsar N160 and X-Blade both feature a telescopic front fork and a monoshock rear suspension.
- However, if fuel efficiency and a more budget-friendly price tag are your main concerns, the Honda X-Blade is a suitable choice.
In the realm of affordable and sporty naked streetfighters, the Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Honda X-Blade stand as formidable contenders. Both motorcycles boast a sleek design, nimble handling, and impressive performance. However, each bike has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, making it essential to compare them thoroughly before making a decision.
Engine and Performance
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is powered by a 164.82cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that produces 15.88 PS of power at 8750 rpm and 14.6 Nm of torque at 6750 rpm. In comparison, the Honda X-Blade features a 162.71cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that generates 13.93 PS of power at 8500 rpm and 13.9 Nm of torque at 6000 rpm.
While both engines are comparable in displacement, the Pulsar N160 offers slightly higher power and torque outputs. This translates into better acceleration and top speed for the Pulsar.
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor for commuters. The Bajaj Pulsar N160 claims a mileage of 50 kmpl, while the Honda X-Blade boasts a slightly higher mileage of 55 kmpl. However, real-world mileage may vary depending on riding conditions and individual riding style.
Handling and Suspension
The Pulsar N160 and X-Blade both feature a telescopic front fork and a monoshock rear suspension. The Pulsar N160’s front fork has a longer travel of 135mm compared to the X-Blade’s 120mm. This provides the Pulsar with slightly better ride comfort over rough roads.
In terms of handling, both bikes are agile and maneuverable, offering a sporty riding experience. The Pulsar N160’s wider tires (front: 100/80-17, rear: 130/70-17) provide better grip and stability compared to the X-Blade’s narrower tires (front: 80/100-17, rear: 120/80-17).
Features
The Pulsar N160 comes equipped with a fully digital instrument cluster, LED headlamp, gear indicator, and a USB charging port. The X-Blade, on the other hand, features an analog-digital instrument cluster, halogen headlamp, and a digital gear indicator.
Price and Availability
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is priced at Rs. 1.23 lakhs, while the Honda X-Blade is available at Rs. 1.13 lakhs (ex-showroom, Delhi). The Pulsar N160 is available in five color options, while the X-Blade is offered in three color choices.
Pros and Cons
Bajaj Pulsar N160
- Pros:
- Higher power and torque output
- Better acceleration and top speed
- Wider tires for improved grip and stability
- Fully digital instrument cluster
- LED headlamp
- Cons:
- Lower fuel efficiency
- No ABS as standard
Honda X-Blade
- Pros:
- Higher fuel efficiency
- Analog-digital instrument cluster
- Halogen headlamp
- Digital gear indicator
- Cons:
- Lower power and torque output
- Narrower tires
- No fully digital instrument cluster
Which Bike Should You Choose?
The choice between the Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Honda X-Blade ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize power, acceleration, and sporty handling, the Pulsar N160 is the better option. However, if fuel efficiency and a more budget-friendly price tag are your main concerns, the Honda X-Blade is a suitable choice.
Alternatives to Consider
In addition to the Pulsar N160 and X-Blade, there are other naked streetfighters in the same segment that you may want to consider:
- Yamaha FZ-S FI
- TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
- Suzuki Gixxer 155
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
1. Which bike has a better design?
Both the Pulsar N160 and X-Blade feature stylish and sporty designs. The choice depends on personal preference.
2. Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
The Pulsar N160’s longer front fork travel provides slightly better ride comfort over rough roads.
3. Which bike has a more advanced instrument cluster?
The Pulsar N160 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, while the X-Blade has an analog-digital cluster.
4. Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
The Honda X-Blade has a slightly higher claimed fuel efficiency of 55 kmpl compared to the Pulsar N160’s 50 kmpl.
5. Which bike is a better value for money?
The Honda X-Blade is priced lower than the Pulsar N160, making it a more budget-friendly option.